2
$\begingroup$

I have seen both XM and XM+ receivers and am wondering which one would be better to get for a micro-drone build. What are the differences in specs? (range, reliability, weight, etc)

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

According to Oscar Liang, the XM+:

  • Is larger and heavier than XM (21.5 x 12 x 3.5 mm – 1.6 g)
  • Has diversity antennae, unlike XM
  • Has solder pads in addition to pin headers
  • Doesn't support Smart Port telemetry
  • Has RSSI channel support on a dedicated pad and 16th channel
  • Has a wider input voltage range than XM (3.7v-10v)
| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The XM+ is actually larger and heavier then the XM: XM – 15.0×10.0x3.5mm – 1.0g XM+ (plus) – 21.5x12x3.5mm – 1.6g $\endgroup$ – Ben Wilson Apr 24 at 4:37
  • $\begingroup$ @BenWilson Oh, you're right! I read that wrong, sorry. $\endgroup$ – ifconfig Apr 24 at 4:38
2
$\begingroup$

As far as I know, they are almost the same.

The only difference is that the XM+ has a diversity receiver so will be more reliable. It also weighs slightly more and is slightly larger (though it’s a negligible amount in my opinion).

If it were me, I’d go for the XM+ for the extra peace of mind.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.